Maladministration and corruption remain the key factors derailing public service delivery, Deputy Public Protector Adv. Kevin Malunga said, addressing the 3rd GovLaw Conference.
Speaking at the CSIR Convention Centre in Pretoria, where heads of governance and legal units from governments, state entities and academic institutions converged, Adv. Malunga said this was particularly the case in public procurement. He noted the derailment of service delivery delayed the fulfilment of South Africa’s constitutional dream, which included redressing apartheid imbalances and gender inequalities, among others. During his address Adv. Malunga outlined the role the Office of the Public Protector plays in addressing complaints concerning tenders and state contracts. He noted the various complaints as being frequently raised namely:- failure to follow the normal tender procedures
- complaints relating to the tender advertisements or documents
- adjudication or consideration of tenders
- cancellation of contracts
- allegations of corruption, fraud or bribery.
He noted that government had put in place a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure that the state procures goods or services in a manner that was fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective. However, reports by the Public Protector, Auditor-General and research by oversight bodies such as the Public Service Commission have consistently shown weaknesses in the implementation of the framework, said Adv. Malunga.
He called for the next phase of the effort to ensure adherence to sustainable economic procurement practices to be focused on institutionalising the principles of accountability, integrity and responsiveness in the public service. Adv. Malunga said it was important for integrity institutions such as the Public Protector SA, which have jurisdiction over public procurement, to remind government and its officials of the promises made to provide a better life for all citizens. He emphasised that the point was not about the Public Protector having teeth but being the conscience of the state. “If government listens to the complaints of citizens it will probably earn their trust,” he said. “It then becomes a win win situation as constitutional democracy is enhanced and trust in government is improved.” He noted that the reverse will probably happen if government does not listen to the complaints of citizens.