Regulatory Impact Assessments to demonstrate value of transport sector reform in Namibia | Infrastructure news

The majority of barriers to trade in services are embedded in regulations. Poorly conceived and implemented rules and regulations impact negatively on the ability of service providers to efficiently supply their markets. The corollary of this inefficiency is the additional cost imposed on users of services and final consumers of the products.

In the road freight transport sector, for example, a few transport rules limit the ability of transport operators to pick up cargo in the destination country which is intended for delivery to countries other than the vehicle’s point of origin. Hence if a vehicle from Namibia delivers cargo to Zambia, that vehicle cannot then pick up a load in Zambia for transportation to Tanzania unless his route passes through Namibia. Such practices have resulted in a high number of trucks returning to their point of origin empty. Naturally, this represents an additional cost to transport operators which is passed on the operators’ clients and ultimately the final consumers.

Approaches to reducing or eliminating regulatory barriers include unilateral regulatory reform, sector- based regulatory cooperation with neighboring countries or countries with a shared interest in creating more effective regulatory frameworks and engaging in services negotiations where trade partners make commitments to lower or eliminate regulations which impede trade.

SATH has embarked on a number of initiatives which embrace these approaches; working with stakeholders to reduce or remove regulatory barriers in the context of the Trans Kalahari and Dar Corridors. SATH’s Trade in Services program is assisting Malawi and Tanzania in preparing their requests to other Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) member states for the removal of barriers in conjunction with Trade in Services.

The most recent SATH initiative to assist in creating a more business friendly environment is implementation of pilot regulatory impact assessments (RIAs). This type of support is an essential element of unilateral regulatory reform. A RIA is a quantitative tool that aids decision-makers in improving their regulatory frameworks by:

  • Clearly identifying the problems to be addressed;
  • Presenting the range of policy options to address identified constraints;
  • Analyzing these options to understand the impact of the different available policies on various stakeholder groups; and
  • Recommending the best available option on the basis of the analysis.
SATH has partnered with the Department of Transport in Namibia’s Ministry of Works and Transport to assess select aspects of Namibia’s road transport legislation, regulations, policy and environment. From April 16-20, 2012, SATH, along with officials of the Department of Transport, met with a variety of stakeholders including representatives of business associations which advocate on behalf of the passenger and freight industry, managers of the main transport corridors, regulatory authorities with oversight for road transport and relevant policy-makers.

SATH was particularly pleased to have the opportunity to present the RIA concept at a meeting chaired by the Deputy Minister of Works and Transport, Dr. Chief Ankama. Early involvement by policy-makers at the highest levels is a key element in securing regulatory reform and this interface certainly represents a positive step. As the RIA gets underway, SATH has committed to working closely with technical officers from the Department of Works and Transport to ensure that these important skills are being transferred to Namibian officials. The expectation is that the department will anchor RIA as an important tool in its policy-making arsenal.

With high expectations on the part of the Namibian Government that this regulatory reform will make a significant contribution to achieving its goal of becoming a regional transport and transit hub by 2025, SATH is confident that the RIA approach will yield tangible results for Namibia. In addition, it sends a positive signal to other SADC member states on the benefits of employing empirically based decision- making tools and of regulatory reform generally.

 

Source: http://www.satradehub.org

Additional Reading?

Request Free Copy