American infrastructure needs a facelift
Infrastructure was one of Trump’s key focus points during his run for the presidency. “It’s no secret the US needs to invest in its crumbling bridges and highways,” American media reports indicated. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, America currently has a backlog of infrastructure projects that is expected to cost the country $3.6 trillion by 2020. For a country with a population size of 324 118 787, the need to develop and maintain its infrastructure is “stark, and the benefits to the economy so obvious, that it was one of the few areas where Trump and Clinton agreed this campaign season,” Quartz magazine reported. While Trump indicated that he would at least double the $275 billion that Democratic Party Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton proposed, he initially did not give the public a precise figure.Infrastructure and funding objectives
Trump said his focus would be to develop transportation, water, telecommunications, and electricity systems, using “American steel made by American workers.” He also suggested that he would attract private investment by using tax credits as an incentive and would streamline permitting for pipelines and other energy projects. Despite no clear pay structure for this, Trump alluded to issuing bonds and supporting an infrastructure bank.“We’ll get a fund, make a phenomenal deal with low interest rates, and rebuild our infrastructure,” he said.
However, shortly before election day, Trump proposed a $1 trillion infrastructure construction plan. “We are going to fix our inner cities and rebuild our highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, schools and hospitals,” he said. “We are going to rebuild our infrastructure, which will become, by the way, second to none. We will put millions of our people to work as we rebuild it.” He later indicated that his plan would actually only require $167 billion in government outlays through tax credits to private construction companies. “The program was a linchpin of Trump’s promise to pump up US economic growth to 4% a year and create 25 million new jobs,” Michael Hiltzik, a LA Times columnist said. Media reports said that many economists doubt that Trump’s plan would put infrastructure construction where it was most needed, or that the program was even affordable. One American economist said the prospect of Trump’s keenness to spend helped lift the US stock market on Wednesday, when he won the presidency.
