Green ratings are growing in South Africa, mainly for upgraded older buildings, but some low scores suggest buildings may appear greener than they are.
When people hear the term “green building”, they often imagine expensive technologies, costly developments or environmentally friendly features that only wealthy buyers can afford.
But green buildings do not have to be luxury log homes surrounded by lush vegetation. A green building can be any size. It is one that is designed, built or upgraded to use water, energy and other resources in a way that causes less harm to the environment. For example, a green building would use natural light and ventilation to reduce the need for electric lighting, air conditioning and fans. It could be built with more sustainable materials, like recycled steel, reclaimed wood, locally made bricks or low-carbon concrete. Indoor spaces in green buildings are designed to be comfortable and reduce running costs over the building’s lifetime. Good insulation, energy-efficient lighting, solar panels and systems that collect rainwater can achieve this. We are sustainable housing researchers who’ve spent years researching how green housing has evolved. In a recent study, we tracked the growth of green building certification in South Africa. We looked at 510 buildings that received green certificates between 2011 and 2023. Our analysis included where they were located, who owned them and the ratings they received. We also looked into whether the certification system stops developers from making misleading claims about how green a building is. Our research found that green building is growing and spreading across South Africa. However, it is mainly happening in Johannesburg, Cape Town and Sandton. This is largely through upgrades to existing buildings rather than new green buildings, showing that green feature upgrades add value to older properties. Most buildings received only mid-level green ratings, however. The highest rating for green buildings – six stars – is quite rare. Some buildings received very low ratings, which means that “greenwashing” (pretending to be green) might be happening. The next step is to establish how much value green upgrades and certification can add to South Africa’s existing properties.How buildings get a green rating
It costs different amounts to get certified, depending on the building. A green building rating measures how well a building saves energy, water and other resources, and reduces carbon emissions and environmental harm. South Africa’s Green Star system, introduced in 2008, rates new and existing buildings, interiors and neighbourhood developments. This system was developed by the Green Building Council South Africa. It sets up a common standard for developers, investors, financiers, owners and occupants to judge how environmentally friendly all buildings are. In South Africa, it’s not compulsory for new buildings to be green. It’s up to investors, developers, building owners and users to opt for green building or not. This is similar to the situation in many developing countries, where including green features in housing developments remains voluntary rather than compulsory. But voluntary does not mean unimportant. Green buildings are increasingly attractive because they can reduce resource consumption and improve energy and water efficiency.They also appeal to buyers as they feature quality and sustainability. Green buildings can have improved indoor air quality, lighting and other measures. They are improved through passive design – the direction a building faces, the size and placement of its windows, and the use of suitable building materials to make the most of natural light and airflow while keeping indoor temperatures comfortable.
Without rating systems and certification, it can be difficult for consumers and investors to tell if a building genuinely reduces the impact on the environment or is just claiming to do so.
